]]>
the only reason why i was looking for e-eclipse was the debuging part where it seemed like e-eclipse had some handy functions.
also i thought i could spend more time with the actual kernel code than worrying about the whole initialization part this way...
i guess i'll just start by resycling some example code for my needs for now
Statistics: Posted by PillePalle — Wed Mar 11, 2015 8:10 pm
]]>
Emacs, vim and Sublime Text will not let you down
Sarah
Statistics: Posted by snim2 — Wed Mar 11, 2015 3:54 pm
]]>
i had already seen that new release you are referring to, but was quite surprised when i didnt find any trace of e-eclipse after setting it up. is there any sort of release time for a newer working e-eclipse version or a good alternative? it just seems like a huge pain to actually write & debug code for the epiphany without any visual feedback...
thanks for your info though! im always thankful for even the slightest push in the right direction
Statistics: Posted by PillePalle — Wed Mar 11, 2015 2:22 pm
]]>
Hope that helps!
Sarah
Statistics: Posted by snim2 — Tue Mar 10, 2015 1:49 pm
]]>
]]>
i was working on my parallella boards the past months using opencl and was now wondering how fast i could get my code using native c and the eSDK.
unfortunately i was not quite able to figure out which version of the eSDK one is supposed to use and which ones actually include the eclipse platform to easily get my code up and running. also i think i read somewhere there should be used different versions of the eSDK for different versions of the parallella board?
i would be really thankful if someone could point me in the right direction. my goal right now would be to get the eSDK WITH eclipse running on a Ubuntu 14.04 VM to start testing native c code on the epiphany chip of my parallella boards
thanks in advance for your help!
Statistics: Posted by PillePalle — Sun Mar 08, 2015 1:37 pm
]]>