thanks for reply Richard, i read the patent in a fast way
, beside the low quality of design i found in that pdf, i'm still thinking that my idea is a lot forward than the patent
.
I'm still able to patent my idea if i have money to do that and mainly if i beleave in patent.
Copyright on a system like this is like thinking that someone can repatent the pitagora theorem :S .
i just shot a pair of solid on blender to concretize my idea and to resolve a pair of geometric solution tht i'm not able to solve by mind.
I already thought about a connection system different to the patented one, i think my junction are more veratile than P (patent) and much more simple on production step (my connection system is just one connector like ram slot with a spine that lock (in the center of the square connector)
maybe i "read" too fast but i don't see any capability to overlay a secondary plane of board.
Obviously the main problem i can see is the limit of the BUS structure ... but we are talking about a cpu designed to do that or not ?
Parallel programming and potentially infinite scalability.